ESG and finance: the role of economic instruments in implementing international environmental standards in business practices

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17323/jil.2026.39148

Keywords:

ESG, international ecological standards, economic instruments, sustainable development, sustainable finance, sustainable investment, stakeholders

Abstract

According to the stakeholder theory, individuals who, for one reason or another, have an interest in a company’s activities, referred to as stakeholders, exert influence on the company’s decision-making, including decisions related to the implementation of international environmental standards in its business practices, as well as on its position in the market. Scholars tend to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of these standards based on ESG ratings or the dynamics of the financial performance of the company, primarily analysing the views of its managers and investors. This article applies an integrated managerial approach to identify criteria for the effectiveness of companies’ implementation of international environmental standards from the perspective of management, investors, regulators and legislators, credit institutions, self-regulatory organisations, stock exchanges, and consumers — that is, all parties with whom most companies interact in the course of conducting their activities. This approach uses stakeholder theory to determine how stakeholders influence the decision-making process in the company and understand the effectiveness of the implementation of international environmental standards in its business practices. It also integrates elements of the legal method to analyse the views of the developers of these standards on the effectiveness of their implementation. In the course of the research, several tendencies that affect international law have been identified. One of these tendencies is decentralisation. It manifests itself in the fact that stakeholders such as regulators and stock exchanges increasingly prefer to accept international ecological standards as primary standards instead of developing their own. Decentralisation leads to soft law regulation being more prevalent than binding norms. In addition, in recent years, the developers of international ecological standards have been increasingly taking the interests of the company and its stakeholders, particularly investors, into account. The paper concludes that the trend of integrating the economic element into these standards will continue and may affect other branches regulating relations involving business.

Author Biography

  • Vadim Gabrielov, HSE University

    postgraduate student, School of International Law

References

Дорофеев, М. Л. (2022). Классификация методов и инструментов государственного финансового регулирования социально-экономического неравенства домохозяйств. Вестник университета, 5, 193–202. = Dorofeev, M. L. (2022). Classification of methods and instruments of government financial regulation of household socio-economic inequality. Vestnik Universiteta, 5, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-5-193-202

Понаморенко, Е. В. (2023). Корпоративный комплаенс в механизме международного финансово-правового регулирования. Журнал ВШЭ по международному праву, 1(2), 32–42. = Ponamorenko, E. V. (2023). Corporate compliance in the mechanism of international financial regulation. HSE University Journal of International Law, 1(2), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.17323/jil.2023.18187

Almeyda, R., & Darmansyah, A. (2019). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure on firm financial performance. IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series, 5, 271–277. http://dx.doi.org/10.12962%2Fj23546026.y2019i5.6340

Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: evidence from a global survey. Financial Analyst Journal, 74(3), 87–103. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2925310

Archer, M. (2022). The ethics of ESG: Sustainable finance and the emergence of the market as an ethical subject. Focaal: Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 93, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2022.930102

Auzepy, A., Bannier, C. E., & Martin, F. (2023). Are sustainability-linked loans designed to effectively incentivize corporate sustainability? A framework for review. Financial Management, 52(4), 642–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12437

Barman, E. (2018). Doing well by doing good: a comparative analysis of ESG standards for responsible investment. In G. Cattani (Ed.) Sustainability, stakeholder governance, and corporate social responsibility (advances in strategic management), 38 (pp. 289–311). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000038016

Bae, J., Yang, X., & Kim, M.-I. (2021). ESG and stock price crash risk: role of financial constraints. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 50(5), p. 556–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12351

Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: the divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

Bizoumi, T., Lazaridis, S., & Stamou, N. (2019). Innovation in stock exchanges: driving ESG disclosure and performance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 31(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12348

Bradford, M., Earp, J. B., & Williams, P. F. (2017). Understanding sustainability for socially responsible investing and reporting. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 1(1), 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-10-2017-005

Burke, J. J. (2022). Do boards take environmental, social, and governance issues seriously? Evidence from media coverage and CEO dismissals. Journal of Business Ethics, 176(2), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04715-x

Částek, O., & Cenek, M. (2017). A relationship between stakeholder management and business performance in the Czech republic. Managing Global Transitions, 15(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.15.187-207

Chang, H-H., & Chuang, W-J. (2021). Encourage stakeholder engagement in sustainable development: drivers of consumers themselves benefits and society welfares. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2085

Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.840

Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131

Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2021). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506

Dewi, A. K., Harto, P. (2023). The effect of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure on the company’s market value in Indonesia. Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 16(3), 608–619. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v16i3.19923

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887

Erasmus, E. G. (2025). Systematic risk and macroprudential regulations: a literature review. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 29(3), 241–263.

Horobeţ, A., Mnohoghitnei, I., Belaşcu, L., & Croitoru, I. M. (2023). ESG reporting and capital market investors: insights from the global technology and fintech industries. Studies in Business and Economics, 18(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0031

Folqué, M., Escrig-Olmedo, E., & Corzo Santamaría, T. (2021). Sustainable development and financial system: integrating ESG risks through sustainable investment strategies in a climate change context. Sustainable Development, 29(5), 876–890. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2181

Fornasari, F. (2020). Knowledge and power in measuring the sustainable corporation: stock exchanges as regulators of ESG factors disclosure. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 19(2), 167–233.

Gangloff, K. A., Connelly, B. L., & Shook, C. L. (2016). Of scapegoats and signals: investor reactions to CEO succession in the aftermath of wrongdoing. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1614–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515521

Gubareva, M., Umar, Z., Sokolova. T., & Antonyuk, V. (2023). For whom does it pay to be a moral capitalist? Sustainability of corporate financial performance of ESG investment. PLoS ONE, 18(5), e0285027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285027

Hubbard, T. D., Christensen, D. M., & Graffin, S. D. (2017). Higher highs and lower lows: the role of corporate social responsibility in CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2255–2265. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2646

Jebe, R. (2019). The convergence of financial and ESG materiality: taking sustainability mainstream. American Business Law Journal, 53(3), 645–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12148

Khanna, M., Quimio, W. R. H., & Bojilova, D. (1998). Toxics release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 16(3), 243–266, https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1048

La Torre, M., Leo, S., & Panetta, I. C. (2021). Banks and environmental, social and governance drivers: follow the market or the authorities? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(6), 1620–1634. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2132

Lee, E., Jung, C. S., & Kwak, J. (2016). The role of trade associations in environmental compliance under limited enforcement: the case of small businesses. Environmental Policy and Guidance, 26(5), 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1723

Menicucci, E. & Paolucci, G. (2023). ESG dimensions and bank performance: an empirical investigation in Italy. Corporate Governance, 23(3), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0094

Moloney, N., Ferran, E., & Payne, J. (2015). The Oxford handbook of financial regulation. Oxford University Press.

Nelemans, M. D. H. ESG targets for the financial sector and the choice of legal instruments. In L. Spataro, M. C. Quirici, G. Iermano (Eds.) ESG integration and SRI strategies in the EU (pp. 217–241). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-36457-0_11

Park, Y. S. & Lee, H. S. (2023). The roles of finance in ESG management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 52(2), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12436

Pollman, E. (2022). The making and meaning of ESG. Harvard Business Law Review, 14, 403–453.

Pranith, K. R. (2023). Enriching the green economy through sustainable investments: an ESG-based credit rating model for green financing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, 138315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138315

Preuss, L. (2007). Buying into our future: sustainability initiatives in local government procurement. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(5), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.578

Ronalter, L. M., Bernardo, M., & Romaní, J. M. (2023). Quality and environmental management systems as business tools to enhance ESG performance: a cross-regional empirical study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(9), 9067–9109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02425-0

Toker, H. (2023). Global reporting initiative. In S. O. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. Del Baldo, R. Abreu (Eds.) Encyclopedia of sustainable management (pp. 1701–1706). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_294

Vuong, M. (2022). The European Union’s sustainable finance disclosure regulation: compliance & policy implications. The International Lawyer, 55(2), 395–407.

Zetzsche, D. A., Bodellini, M., & Consiglio, R. (2022). The EU sustainable finance framework in light of international standards. Journal of International Economic Law, 25(4), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgac043

Zheng, J., Khurram, M. U., & Chen, L. (2022). Can green innovation affect ESG ratings and financial performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM listed companies. Sustainability, 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148677

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

Issue

Section

Interdisciplinary Researches

How to Cite

ESG and finance: the role of economic instruments in implementing international environmental standards in business practices. (2026). HSE University Journal of International Law, 4(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.17323/jil.2026.39148