ISDA master agreement as a source of lex mercatoria in the international derivatives market
Abstract
International financial markets play a vital role in the modern market economy. Among the instruments traded in these markets, derivative contracts are of particular interest. Over-the-counter derivatives are widely used to allocate risks pertaining to commercial activity. In contrast to many other commercial transactions, derivative products are documented based on model contracts produced by the professional community. The ISDA Master Agreement is by far the most influential of these. This framework contract is published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (hereinafter — ISDA), a private corporation established in 1985 to represent swap dealers and promote swaps contracts in general. Currently ISDA is a driving force behind the regulation of over-the-counter financial markets on a global scale. The prevailing use of its standard agreements may lead to the conclusion that ISDA documentation is a part of lex mercatoria, the a-national legal order not relying on any state law. Many scholars in the field of private international law tend to share this view. The article maintains that a connection to the laws of common law jurisdictions such as the state of New York and England and Wales is a strong argument against the status of ISDA agreements as transnational law. Apart from that it considers contractual self-help remedies, such as suspension of performance and close-out netting, as evidence of transnational and autonomous nature of ISDA documentation. Though their existence seems more convincing than the wide use of ISDA templates alone, these provisions are interpreted by national courts in reliance on the rules of applicable law. In the conclusion the author notes that, despite their importance in financial markets, the ISDA Master Agreements by no means operate as contrat sans loi. Therefore, they lack the degree of autonomy demonstrated by the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts and some of the International Chamber of Commerce (hereinafter — ICC) publications, and cannot be considered the sources of lex mercatoria in the strictest sense. However, given its enormous experience, the ISDA may, in future, draft a contractual instrument not connected to any national legal order. At present, in response to the need to update its standard documentation in the wake of the UK's exit from the European Union, ISDA has chosen to re-subordinate its 2002 model contracts to the laws of France and the Republic of Ireland, rather than publish contracts that are not governed by the law of any state.
Downloads
References
Канашевский, В. А. (2019). Международное частное право: учебник (4-е изд., перераб. и доп.). Международные отношения. = Kanashevskiy, V. A. (2019). International private law: textbook (4th ed., amended and supplemented). Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.
Armitage, M. (2022). Neither relational nor discrete: the ISDA Master Agreement as a bimodal contract. Capital Markets Law Journal, 17(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmac013
Benjamin, J. (2007). Financial law. Oxford University Press.
Benzler, M. (1999). Nettingverbarungen im auserborslichen Derivativehandel. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
Berger, K. P. (2010). The creeping codification of the new lex mercatoria (2nd ed.). Kluwer Law International.
Berger, K. P. (1999). The creeping codification of the lex mercatoria. Kluwer Law International.
Borowicz, M. K. (2021). Contracts as regulation: the ISDA Master Agreement. Capital Markets Law Journal, 16(1), 72–94.
Borowicz, M. K. (2015). Private power and international law: the international swaps and derivatives association. European Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1), 46–66.
Braithwaite, J. (2012). Standard form contracts as transnational law: evidence from the derivatives markets. Modern Law Review, 75, 779–805.
Braithwaite, J. (2020). The financial courts: adjudicating disputes in derivatives markets. Cambridge University Press.
Charles, G. (2009). OTC derivative contracts in bankruptcy: the Lehman experience. NY Business Law Journal, 13(1), 14–17.
Cuniberti, G. (2013). Three theories of lex mercatoria. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 52(1), 369–434.
Dalhuisen, J. H. (2013). Dalhuisen on transnational comparative, commercial, financial and trade law (5th ed.). Hart Publishing.
Datoo, A., Williams, P., & Whiteley, R. (2023). A new approach to close-out netting legal opinions in respect of OTC derivatives and securities financing transactions. Journal of Securities Operations and Custody, 15(3), 260–277.
Ferrari, F., & Rosenfeld, F. (2021). International commercial arbitration: a comparative introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Fouchard, P., Gaillard, E., & Goldman, B. (1996) Traite de l'arbitrage commercial international. Litec.
Gaillard, E. (2001). Transnational law: a legal system or a method of decision making? Arbitration International, 17(1), 59–71.
Gaudemet, A. (2016) Al estudio jurídico de los derivados en el derecho francés. Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado, 26, 49–70.
Goldman, B. (1964). Frontières du droit et ‘lex mercatoria. Archives de philosophie du droit, 9, 177–192.
Goode, R., & McKendrick, E. (2010). Goode on commercial law (4th ed.). Penguin.
Hull, J. C. (2022). Options, futures, and other derivatives (11th ed). Pearson Education.
James, S. (1999). The law of derivatives. London: Informa Law from Routledge.
Kindt, T. (2023). Transnationale Verträge im nationalen Recht: Theorie und Dogmatik transnationaler Ordnungsstrukturen am Beispiel von Musterverträgen im Finanzbereich. Mohr Siebeck.
Kolb, R. W., & Overdahl, J. A. (2003). Financial derivatives (3rd ed.). Wiley and Sons.
Malynes, G. (1622). Consuetudo, vel lex mercatoria, or the ancient law-merchant Diuided into three parts: according to the essential parts of trafficke. Necessarie for all statesmen, judges, magistrates, temporall and ciuile lawyers, mint-men, merchants, marriners, and all others negotiating in all places of the world. Adam Islip.
McNamara, C., & Metrick, A. (2019). The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy F: introduction to the ISDA Master Agreement. The Journal of Financial Crises, 1(1), 137–150.
Muscat B. (2009). OTC Derivatives: salient practices and developments relating to standard market documentation. Bank of Valletta Review, 39, 32–47.
Paech, P. (2016). The value of financial market insolvency safe harbours. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 36(4), 855–884. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqv041
Reiner, G. (2002). Derivate Finanzinstrumente im Recht. Nomos.
Schmithoff, C. (1968). The unification or harmonisation of law by means of standard contracts and general conditions. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 17, 551–570.
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0