Внедрение устойчивого развития на уровне корпорации: когнитивные искажения членов советов директоров в отношении ESG и средства их преодоления

  • Дмитрий Иванович Текутьев Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-0515
Ключевые слова: устойчивое развитие, ESG, имплементация, корпоративное управление, совет директоров, когнитивное искажение

Аннотация

В настоящей статье анализируется, как международно признанные принципы устойчивого развития могут быть имплементированы на корпоративном уровне и с какими проблемами совет директоров компании может столкнуться при внедрении ESG. В частности, в статье рассматривается проблема когнитивных искажений членов советов директоров по отношению к концепции ESG. Автор фокусируется на пяти наиболее известных, часто встречающихся и концептуально описанных в поведенческой литературе когнитивных искажениях в отношении ESG: сверхоптимизме, эффекте статуса-кво, предвзятости подтверждения, гиперболическом дисконтировании и групповом мышлении. Далее в статье даются рекомендации по преодолению или смягчению этих искажений путем внедрения в корпоративную практику процедур принятия решений и средств контроля их качества. Эти инструменты условно подразделяются на три группы: изменение стимулов, оптимизация архитектуры выбора и техники выявления когнитивных искажений в процессе принятия решений. Автор полагает, что анализ внедрения ESG в корпоративную практику с позиций поведенческой экономики и права позволит по-новому взглянуть на эту проблему. В статье анализируются как существующая литература по праву, поведенческой экономике и психологии, так и данные, полученные в ходе непосредственных наблюдений, эмпирических исследований советов директоров, анкетирования, фокус-групп.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.

Биография автора

Дмитрий Иванович Текутьев, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»

кандидат юридических наук, доцент Департамента правового регулирования бизнеса факультета права Национального исследовательского университета «Высшая школа экономики», Москва, Россия

Литература

Abatecola G. (2014) Untangling Self-Reinforcing Processes in Managerial Decision Making. Co-evolving Heuristics?. Management Decision, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 934–949. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2013-0543

Ainslie G. (1975) Specious Reward: A Behavioral Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulsive Control. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 463–496. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/h0076860

Ainslie G. (2015) The Cardinal Anomalies that Led to Behavioral Economics: Cognitive or Motivational?. Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 37, nos. 4–5, pp. 261–273. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2715

Amorelli M., García-Sánchez I. (2020) Trends in the Dynamic Evolution of Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 537–554. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2079

Argote L., Greve H. (2007) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm: 40 Years and Counting, Introduction, and Impact. Organization Science, vol. 18, pp. 337–349. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0280

Barsade S., Ward A., Turner J., Sonnenfeld J. (2000) To your Heart's Content: A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 802–836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667020

Bazerman M., Moore D. (2009) Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Bhargava S., Loewenstein G. (2015) Behavioral Economics and Public Policy 102: Beyond Nudging. American Economic Review, vol. 105, pp. 396–401. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151049

Brodbeck F., Kerschreiter R., Mojzisch A., Schulz-Hardt S. (2007) Group Decision Making under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 459–479. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351441

Burke J., Hotash R., Hotash U. (2017) The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 154, no. 4, pp. 1161–1186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3453-2

Coase R. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 386–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

Cohan J. (2002) “I Didn't Know” and “I Was Only Doing My Job”: Has Corporate Governance Careened out of Control? A Case Study of Enron's Information Myopia. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 275–299. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020506501398

Cristofaro M. (2016) Reducing Biases of Decision-Making Processes in Complex Organizations. Management Research Review, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 270–291. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2016-0054

Cyert R., March J. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ, USA: Englewoods Prentice-Hall. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1021288ar

Ebert P., Freibichler W. (2017) Nudge Management: Applying Behavioral Science to Increase Knowledge Worker Productivity. Journal of Organization Design, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–6. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-017-0014-1

Eccles R., Ioannou I., Serafeim G. (2014) The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2835–2857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Ees H. van, Gabrielsson J., Huse M. (2009) Toward a Behavioral Theory of Boards and Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 307–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x

Elmagrhi M., Ntim C., Elamer A., Zhang Q. (2019) A Study of Environmental Policies and Regulations, Governance Structures, and Environmental Performance: The Role of Female Directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 206–220. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250

Forgas J. (1983). Episode Cognition and Personality: A Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Personality, vol. 51. no. 1, pp. 34–48. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00852.x

Fox C., Sitkin S. (2015) Bridging the Divide between Behavioral Science and Policy. Behavioral Science & Policy, vol. 1, pp. 1–12. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2015.0004

Geletkanycz M. (1997) The Salience of “Culture's Consequences”: The Effects of Cultural Values on Top Executive Commitment to the Status Quo. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 615–634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199709)18:8%3C615::aid-smj889%3E3.0.co;2-i

Ghoshal S., Moran P. (1996) Bad for Practice: a Critique of Transaction Cost Theory, Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, pp. 13–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258627

Gneezy U., Meier, S., Rey-Biel P. (2011) When and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify behavior. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 191–209. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/41337236

Greve H. (2003) Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615139

Groysberg B., Bell D. (2013) Dysfunction in the Boardroom. Harvard Business Review, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 88–97.

Hammond S., Keeney R., Raiffa H. (1998) The Hidden Traps in Decision Making. Harvard Business Review, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 1–47.

Hart P. (1991) Irving L. Janis' Victims of Groupthink. Political Psychology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 247–278. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/3791464

Hart P. (1998) Preventing Groupthink Revisited: Evaluating and Reforming Groups in Government. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 73, nos. 2–3, pp. 306–326. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2764

Haselton M., Nettle D., Andrews P. (2005) The Evolution of Cognitive Bias. In: Buss D. M. (ed.). The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Hendry J. (2005) Beyond Self-Interest: Agency Theory and the Board in a Satisficing World. British Journal of Management, vol. 16, pp. 55–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00447.x

Hermann A., Rammal H. (2010) The Grounding of the “Flying Bank”. Management Decision, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1048–1062. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011068761

Hirt E., Markman K. (1995) Multiple Explanation: A Consider-an-Alternative Strategy for Debiasing Judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 69, pp. 1069–1086. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1069

Howard A. (2010) Groupthink and Corporate Governance Reform: Changing the Formal and Informal Decision Making Processes of Boards'. Interdisciplinary Law Journal, vol. 20, pp. 425–457.

Huse M., Minichilli A., Schoning M. (2005) Corporate Boards as Assets for Operating in the New Europe: The Value of Process Oriented Boardroom Dynamics. Organizational Dynamics, vol. 34, pp. 285–297. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.06.007

Janis I. (1972) Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627340700115

Jensen M., Meckling W. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3., no. 4, pp. 305–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x

Johnson E., Goldstein D. (2003). Do Defaults Save Lives?. Science, vol. 302, no. 5649, pp. 1338–1339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721

Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1973) On the Psychology of Prediction. Psychological Review, vol. 80, pp. 237–257. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/h0034747

Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk, Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 263–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler R. (1990) Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Goase Theorem, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. 1325–1348. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1086/261737

Kahneman D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY, USA: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-013-0533-y

Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler R. (1991) Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 193–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193

Kamalnath A. (2017) Gender Diversity as the Antidote to Groupthink on Corporate Boards. Deakin Law Review, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2017vol22no1art723

Korobkin R. (1998) Status Quo Bias and Contract Default Rules. Cornell Law Review, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 608–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e683302011-044

Korobkin R., Ulen T. (2000) Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics. California Law Review, vol. 88, pp. 1051–1144. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.229937

Kraakman R., Armour J., Davies P., Enriques L., Hansmann H., Hertig G., Hopt K., Kanda H., Pargendler M., Ringe W.-G., Rock E. (2017) The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach, Oxford, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001

Kunreuther H. (2014) Aiding Decision Making to Reduce the Impacts of Climate Change. Journal of Consumer Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 397–411. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-013-9251-z

Laibson D. (1997) Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 443–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555253

Langer E. (1975) The Illusion of Control. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 311–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.32.2.311

Langevoort D. (1997) Organized Illusions: A Behavioral Theory of Why Corporations Mislead Stock Market Investors (And Cause Social Harms). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 146, no. 101, pp. 101–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3312706

Larrick R., Morgan J., Nisbett R. (1990) Teaching the Use of Cost-Benefit Reasoning in Everyday Life. Psychological Science, vol. 1, pp. 362–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00243.x

Laufer W. (2003) Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 253–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022962719299

Laureiro-Martinez D. (2014) Cognitive Control Capabilities, Routinization Propensity, and Decision-Making Performance. Organization Science, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1111–1133. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0899

Laverty K. (1996) Economic “Short-Termism”: The Debate, the Unresolved Issues, and the Implications for Management Practice and Research. Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 825–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9702100316

Loewenstein G., Thaler R. (1989) Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 181–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.4.181

Lord C., Lepper M., Preston E. (1984) Considering the Opposite: A Corrective Strategy for Social Judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 1231–1243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.47.6.1231

Magnan M., Tebourbi I. (2009) A Critical Analysis of Six Practices Underlying Executive Compensation Practices. Compensation & Benefits Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 42–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368709334574

Marginson D., McAulay L. (2008) Exploring the Debate on Short-Termism: a Theoretical and Empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 29, pp. 273–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.657

Marquis C., Lee M. (2013) Who is Governing Whom? Executives, Governance, and the Structure of Generosity in Large U.S. Firms. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 483–497. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/23471020

Mason R., Mitroff I. (1981) Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions, New York: Wiley.

McGuinness P., Vieito J., Wang M. (2017) The Role of Board Gender and Foreign Ownership in the CSR Performance of Chinese Listed Firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 42, pp. 75–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.11.001

Milliken F., Martins L. (1996) Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, pp. 402–433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258667

Morewedge C., Yoon H., Scopelliti I., Symborski C., Korris J., Kassam K. (2015). Debiasing Decisions. Improved Decision Making With A Single Training Intervention. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 129–140. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600886

Nelson R. (1995) Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 48–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95661-3_5

Nemeth‎ C., Connell J., Rogers J., Brow K. (2001) Improving Decision Making by Means of Dissent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 806–820. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02481.x

Nickerson R. (1998) Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 175–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1089-2680.2.2.175

Ocasio W. (1999) Institutionalized Action and Corporate Governance: The Reliance on Rules of CEO Succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, pp. 285–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667000

O'Connor M. (2003) The Enron Board: the Perils of Groupthink. University of Cincinnati Law Review, vol. 71, pp. 1233–1320.

Oesterle D. (2014) Should Courts Do Behavioural Analysis of Boardroom Conduct. Journal of Business & Technology Law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 51–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2394154

Peng G. (2021) Is Transaction Cost Economics Behavioral? In: Toward Behavioral Transaction Cost Economics, International Marketing and Management Research, pp. 1–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46878-1_1

Rodrigue M., Magnan M., Cho C. (2013). Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 107–129. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1331-5

Russo J., Schoemaker P. (1990) Decision Traps: Ten Barriers to Brilliant Decision Making and How to Overcome Them, New York, NY, USA: Doubleday. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960040106

Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. (1988) Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 1. pp. 7–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00055564

Sauerwald S., Weichieh S. (2019) CEO Overconfidence and CSR Decoupling. Corporate Governance: An International Review, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 283–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12279

Schanzenbach M., Sitkoff R. (2020) ESG Investing: Theory, Evidence, and Fiduciary Principles. Journal of Financial Planning [Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3684979].

Schwenk C. (1984) Devil's Advocacy in Managerial Decision Making. Journal of Management Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 153–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1984.tb00229.x

Schwenk C. (1989) Devil's Advocacy and the Board: A Modest Proposal. Business Horizons, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 22–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(89)90053-0

Scopelliti I., Morewedge C., McCormick E., Min H., Lebrecht S., Kassam K. (2015) Bias Blind Spot: Structure, Measurement, and Consequences. Management Science, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 2468–2486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096

Simon H. (1955) A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 99–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

Soll B., Klayman J. (2004) Overconfidence in Interval Estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 299–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.299

Souder D., Reilly G., Bromiley P., Mitchell S. (2016) A Behavioral Understanding of Investment Horizon and Firm Performance. Organization Science, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1088

Tang Y., Li J., Yang H. (2015) What I See, What I Do: How Executive Hubris Affects Firm Innovation. Journal of Management, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1698–1723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441211

Thaler R., Benartzi S. (2004) Save More Tomorrow: Using Behavioral Economics to Increase Employee Saving. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 164–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/380085

Thaler R., Sunstein C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Yale, CT, USA : Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-008-9056-2

Tjosvold D. (1982) Effects of Approach to Controversy on Superiors' Incorporation of Subordinates' Information in Decision-Making. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 189–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.67.2.189

Uzun H., Szewczyk S., Varma R. (2004) Board Composition and Corporate Fraud. Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 60, pp. 33–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v60.n3.2619

Waddell B., Roberto M., Yoon S. (2013) Uncovering Hidden Profiles: Advocacy in Team Decision Making. Management Decision, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 321–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741311301849

Weinstein N. (1980) Unrealistic Optimism About Future Life Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 39, pp. 806–820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.806

Woensel L. van. (2020) A Bias Radar for Responsible Policy-Making, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32126-0

Опубликован
2024-02-29
Как цитировать
Текутьев Д. И. (2024). Внедрение устойчивого развития на уровне корпорации: когнитивные искажения членов советов директоров в отношении ESG и средства их преодоления. Журнал ВШЭ по международному праву (HSE University Journal of International Law), 1(4), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.17323/jil.2023.19119
Раздел
Междисциплинарные исследования