Moral Damages in International Investment Law
Abstract
This article discusses the notion of moral damages in international investment arbitration. Although there are currently more than 2500 bilateral investment agreements (hereinafter — BIT) in force, none of them regulates moral damages. The analysis focuses on the historical background of moral damages, which shows that international law has not been overly concerned with their assessment within the last hundred years. As such, despite their almost universal acceptance by international courts and tribunals, there is still no guidance for tribunals on how to approach moral damages, making their assessment a topical issue of modern international law. The article highlights the reasons tribunals give for either completely disregarding such claims, or granting merely symbolic sums, such as non-tangible nature of moral damages, lack of any concrete evidence, or an extremely high threshold. The author concludes that international law still lacks a strict and uniform test, when it comes to moral damages, which are bound to face rather broad and subjective decisions rendered by the tribunals. The author further discusses the problem of assessing moral damages, which also lacks established methodology, and often refers to national law of domestic legal systems instead of a unified standard. In some cases, tribunals do not provide any reasoning or legal basis for their assessment. The author concludes that in the absence of a strict test, investment tribunals may turn to human rights instruments to make the assessment of moral damages clearer and more consistent.
Downloads
References
Aaken A. van (2010) Primary and Secondary Remedies in International Investment Law and National State Liability: A Functional and Comparative View. In: Schill S. (ed.) International Investment Law and Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 721–754. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0023
Conway B. (2012). Moral Damages in Investment Arbitration: A Role for Human Rights? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 371–407. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/ids003
Dawidowicz M. (2013) Moral Damages in Investment Arbitration. In: J. Goldman (ed.) WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Dumberry P. (2018). Moral Damages in Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004357792_007
Ehle B., Dawidowicz M. (2013) Moral Damages in Investment Arbitration, Commercial Arbitration and WTO Litigation. In: Goldman J. (ed.) WTO Litigation, Investment Arbitration, and Commercial Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Houtte H. (2015) Future Damages in Investment Arbitration — a Tribunal with a Crystal Ball? In: Caron D., Schill S., Smutny S., Triantafilou E. (eds.) Practicing Virtue, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 642–657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739807.003.0040
Ichim O. (2014) Just Satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights. In: Ichim O. (ed.) Just Satisfaction under the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139680424
Jagusch S., Sebastian T. (2013) Moral Damages in Investment Arbitration: Punitive Damages in Compensatory Clothing? Arbitration International, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 45–62. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/29.1.45
Lawry-White M. (2012) Are Moral Damages an Exceptional Case? International Arbitration Law Review, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 236–239.
Lunney M., Nolan D. (2017) Tort Law: Text and Materials, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198745525.001.0001
Marboe I. (2017) Calculation of Compensation and Damages in International Investment Law, Oxford University Press, 2nd ed. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/8165_2019_34
Marchili S. (2010) Unexceptional Circumstances: Moral Damages in International Investment Law, Third Annual Investment Treaty Arbitration.
Parish M., Nelson A. (2011) Awarding Moral Damages to Respondent States in Investment Arbitration. Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 235–238.
Ripinsky S., Williams K. (2015) Damages in International Investment Law, British Institute of International and Comparative Law.
Sabahi B. (2011) Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601189.001.0001
Shelton D. (2005) Remedies in International Human Rights Law, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/73.1.381
Schwenzer I., Hachem P. (2011) Moral Damages in International Investment Arbitration. In: Kröll S. (ed.) International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution. Liber Amicorum Eric Bergsten, Alphen aan den Rijn, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Tienhaara K. (2011) Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration: A View from Political Science. In: Brown C., Miles K. (eds.) Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge University Press, pp. 606–628. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043809.034
Trenor J. A. (2022) Guide to Damages in International Arbitration. Global Arbitration Review.
Weber S. (2020) Demystifying Moral Damages in International Investment Arbitration. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, vol. 3, no. 19, pp. 417–450. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341430
Wittich S. (2004) Non-Material Damage and Monetary Reparation in International Law. Finnish Yearbook of International Law, pp. 321–368.
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
