The Road to Utopia is Paved with Contradictions: Theoretical Understanding of the Principle of Equality
Abstract
In modern international law the idea of sovereign equality is the basis for its functioning and further argumentation in reasoning about the violation of law and its effectiveness. It is reflected in the main legal acts, but in fact under the screen of equality the strong states influence the weak ones, imposing their will. The research methodology is based on the study of the nomos of equality, that is, the ordering of norms that exists in the legal imagination. Nomos is shaped through contexts and structures. By placing the nomos in a historical perspective, it is possible to see how it has changed and where it originates. The origins of the idea of equality go deep into history to pagan communities where two global visions of order took shape: a pluralistic cosmos and a hierarchical universe. Christian narratives proclaimed universal equality and unity, but they also adopted a vision of order of the universe that constructed a hierarchy that excluded the “other”. Gradually there was a paradigm shift and reason became the basis of knowledge of the world. With reason came the idea of progress and civilization. Civilization promised the advent of equality, because people with the help of reason could achieve the benefits of the European world and compare with them. But it also established inequality and discrimination. But in the twentieth century, the global narrative describing all law began to disappear from speech and from law. At the same time, many new narratives emerged, deconstructing the idea of a global order. As a result, the nomos of equality is filled with contradictions and is used only as an instrument of influence, because in the nomos of equality itself there is inequality and discrimination due to the perception of order as a universe. As a result, the concept of sovereign equality is rendered meaningless. The longstanding crisis of science and law is resolved by cultural change and the denial of the order of the universe; the metamodernist vision of the world assumes the possibility of reordering the legal order on the basis of the cosmos and the emergence of homogeneous pluralist regimes, each based on its own system of values. The Russian project of equality can be based on the ideas of religious philosophy and the concept of oneness. Such a remote project of utopia fills the insubstantial notion of equality with certain values and ideas.
Downloads
References
Abdollahi M., Behzadi K. (2020) Regional Jus Cogens: Conceptual Difficulties and Practical Challenges. Iranian Review for UN Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 33–74.
Adorno T. V. (2003) Negativnaya dialektika [Negative Dialectics]. Moscow: Nauchny Mir. (In Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12328
Barkova V. V. (2016) Mify o narodah i narody v mifah [Myths about Peoples and Peoples in Myths]. Chelyabinsk: Izd-vo Chelyab. gos. ped. un-ta. (In Russian).
Bederman D. J. (2002) The Spirit of International Law. University of Georgia Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3109873
Ben-Nun G. (2020) How Jewish is International Law?. Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d'histoire du droit international, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 249–281. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1163/15718050-12340171
Brockmeyer J., Harre R. (2000) Narrativ: problemy i obeshchaniya odnoj al'ternativnoy paradigmy [Narrative: Problems and Promises of One Alternative Paradigm]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 3, pp. 29–42. (In Russian).
Caesar G. Yu. (2015) Zapiski o voyne s gallami [Notes on the War with the Gauls]. Cormac. (In Russian).
Cassese A. (ed.) (2012) Realizing Utopia: the Future of International Law. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691661.001.0001
Chimni B. S. (2003) Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto. In: The Third World and International Order (pp. 47–73). Brill Nijhoff. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1163/187197306779173220
Clackson J. (2007) Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1470542709990067
Condorcet J. A. (1936) Eskiz istoricheskoy kartiny progressa chelovecheskogo razuma [Sketch of the Historical Picture of the Progress of Human Reason]. Moscow: Gos. Sots.ekonom izd-va. (In Russian).
Cover R. M. (1983) Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review, vol. 97, pp. 4–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781644693629-025
Degterev D. A. (2016) Sodeystvie mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu: Evolyuciya mezhdunarodno-pravovyh rezhimov i effektivnost' vneshney pomoshchi [International Development Aid: Evolution of International Legal Regimes and Aid Effectiveness]. Moscow: Lenand. (In Russian).
Domingo R., Witte Jr. J. (eds.) (2020) Christianity and Global Law. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad002
Fasmer M. (1986) Etimologicheskiy slovar' russkogo yazyka. V 4t [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
Fatouros A. A. (1964) International Law and the Third World. Virginia Law Review, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 783–823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1071592
Fukuyama F. (2015) Konets istorii i posledniy chelovek [The End of History and the Last Man]. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
Gaius (2020) Institutsii [Institutions]. Moscow: Statute. (In Russian).
Gamkrelidze T. V., Ivanov, V. V. (1984). Indoevropejskiy yazyk i indoevropejtsy [Indo-European language and Indo-Europeans]. Tbilisi : Izd-vo Tbilisskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Grotsiy G. (1994) O prave voyny i mira [On the Law of War and Peace]. Moscow: Ladomir. (In Russian).
Jakupec V. (2017) Foreign Aid: Cultural Values and Nnorms. Sitzungsberichte der Leibniz-Sozietät der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, vol. 131, pp. 209–221.
Justinian (2008) Digesty [Digests]. Moscow: Statute. (In Russian).
Kadelbach S. (2016) Genesis, Function and Identification of Jus Cogens Norms. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015: Jus Cogens: Quo Vadis?, pp. 147–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_6
Kadmus A. (2018) True to the Earth. Pagan Political Theology. Gods&Radicals Press.
Kalamkaryan R. A. (2006) Filosofiya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Philosophy of International Law]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Karandashov I., Shestakova K. (2017) The Principle of Equality of States in the Wake of the Russian Revolution. Russian Law Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 8–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-4-8-42
Kennedy D. (2002) Two Globalization of Law & (and) Legal Thought: 1850-1968. Suffolk UL Rev., vol. 36, pp. 631–674.
Kennedy D., Koskenniemi M. (2023) Of Law and the World: Critical Conversations on Power, History, and Political Economy. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674294899
Khrushcheva N. A. (2020) Metamodern v muzyke i vokrug neyo [Metamodern in and Around Music]. Moscow: RIPOL Classic. (In Russian).
Kleinlein T. (2011) Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht: Konstruktion und Elemente einer idealistischen Völkerrechtslehre (Vol. 231). Springer-Verlag.
Kondurov V. E. (2021) Politicheskaya teologiya Karla Shmitta: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie [Political Theology of Carl Schmitt: Theoretical and Legal Study]. Moscow, 2021. (In Russian).
Koskenniemi M. (2016) What is Critical Research in International Law? Celebrating Structuralism. Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 727–735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156516000285
Lactantius (2007) On the Creation of God. On the Wrath of God. On the Death of Persecutors. Epitomes of Divine Institutions. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko Publishing House.
Lima L. C., & Marotti, L. (2022) An Unlikely Duo? Regionalism and Jus Cogens in International Law. Goettingen Journal of International Law, vol. 12, pp. 219–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-12-1-lima-marotti
Lincoln B. (1986) Myth, Cosmos, and Society: Indo-European Themes of Creation and Destruction. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674864290
Linderfalk U. (2016) Understanding the Jus Cogens Debate: The Pervasive Influence of Legal Positivism and Legal Idealism. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2015: Jus Cogens: Quo Vadis?, pp. 51–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-114-2_3
Lowe D. (2015) Australian Between Empires: The Life of Percy Spender. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315656199
Luk'yanov V. Yu. (2016) Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy ili konets istorii? Teorii S. Hantingtona i F. Fukuyamy v XXI veke [Clash of Civilizations or the End of History? Theories of S. Huntington and F. Fukuyama in the XXI century.]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i upravleniya, vol. 12, no. 4, pp.126–133. (In Russian).
Lyotard J.-F. (2016) Sostoyanie postmoderna [The State of Postmodernity]. SPb.: Aleteya. (In Russian).
Martens F. F. (1898) Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo tsivilizovannyh narodov. Tom 1 [Modern International Law of Civilised Nations. Vol. 1.] St. Petersburg. (In Russian).
Polyakov A. В. (2013) Verhovenstvo prava, globalizatsiya i problemy modernizatsii filosofii i teorii prava [The Rule of Law, Globalisation and Problems of Modernisation of Philosophy and Theory of Law]. Pravovedenie. Vol. 309, no. 4, pp. 18–30. (In Russian).
Saibih J. (2020) Using Narrative Theory on Analysis of Law and Human Rights: Searching Truth on Tanjung Priok’s Incident in Indonesia. In: 3rd International Conference on Law and Governance (ICLAVE 2019). Atlantis Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200321.037
Schmitt K. (2008) Nomos Zemli [Nomos of the Earth]. Saint-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’. (In Russian).
Schpengler O. (2023) Zakat Zapadnogo mira. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii [The Decline of the West. Essays on the Morphology of World History]. Moscow: Azbuka. (In Russian).
Solov’yov V. S. (2001) Kritika otvlechennyh nachal [Critique of Abstracted Beginnings]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Tolstykh V. L. (2022) Krizis Mezhdunarodnogo prava: Diagnoz [Crisis of International Law: Diagnosis]. Zakon, no. 12, pp. 122–133. (In Russian).
van den Akker R. (2020) Metamodernizm. Istorichnost', Affekt i Glubina posle Postmodernizma [Metamodernism. Historicity, Affect and Depth after Postmodernism]. Moscow: RIPOL Classic. (In Russian).
Viñuales J. E. (Ed.) (2020) The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50: An Assessment of the Fundamental Principles of International Law. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652889
Ziborov O., Medushevskaya N., Sigalov K. (2021) The Sociocultural Context in Law: Modernism Postmodernism Metamodernism. Wisdom, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 232–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v1i1.682
Zuo A. (2018). China's Approaches to the Western-Dominated International Law: A Historical Perspective from the Opium War to the South China Sea Arbitration Case. U. Balt. J. Int'l L., vol. 6, pp. 21–55.
This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0